Home Blog

Fixing Core Web Vitals: The "Zero Upfront" Custom Code Solution

// Written by: Jamie Grand

// Last updated:

Modern workspace monitor displaying green fixing Core Web Vitals performance metrics.

/* 🎯 Introduction */

🎯 Quick Answer

For UK businesses, fixing core web vitals with custom code is a permanent architectural solution that outperforms temporary plugins which often fail to address underlying bloat.

  • Custom code solves core performance issues, rather than masking them.
  • It eliminates security risks associated with multiple third-party plugins.
  • A bespoke build directly improves user experience and conversion rates.

Continue reading to see how our “Zero Upfront” model makes this accessible.

Introduction

You have likely installed WP Rocket, tried countless optimization plugins, and compressed every image, yet your Core Web Vitals scores remain poor. More importantly, your site feels slow to your customers. This is the frustrating reality for many UK small businesses who are told that simply installing a plugin is the answer to performance issues.

These tools often create “fake scores” by delaying scripts or deferring loading, rather than solving the real issue: a bloated, inefficient foundation. When the underlying architecture is heavy, no amount of surface-level patching will make it truly fast.

The real solution isn’t another plugin; it is a shift in architecture. Our approach involves a “Zero Upfront” custom code solution designed specifically for UK tradespeople and businesses. With a local focus in Woodford, we build sites that fix performance permanently by writing clean, efficient code from the ground up. This guide breaks down why the plugin approach is failing you and how fixing core web vitals with custom code is more accessible than you might think.


👤 Written by: Jamie Grand Reviewed by: Jamie Grand, Technical Web Developer Last updated: 20 December 2025


ℹ️ Transparency: This article explores Core Web Vitals based on technical experience and industry data. Our “Zero Upfront” service is presented as a solution. All information is reviewed by Jamie Grand. Our goal is to provide a transparent, accurate guide for UK businesses.


The "Plugin Trap": Why Optimization Plugins Fail

Optimization plugins often fail because they add more code and complexity to an already bloated system, rather than removing the source of the problem. When you use tools to “delay JavaScript execution,” you are essentially tricking the speed test into thinking the site is idle, while the main thread remains blocked for the actual user.

The Page Weight Crisis

The web is getting heavier. According to the HTTP Archive’s 2024 Web Almanac, the median desktop page weight has climbed to 2,652 KB[1]. Adding optimization plugins contributes to this bloat, working against the goal of a faster website. Instead of streamlining the code, these plugins often add their own libraries and processing overhead to the server.

The Domino Effect

This creates a domino effect of conflicts and maintenance nightmares. You might install one plugin for caching, another for image compression, and a third for security. These tools often fight for control over the same resources. This directly impacts Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) by adding render-blocking resources that delay the most important content from appearing.

The Myth of a "Quick Fix"

When comparing WP Rocket vs Custom Code, the difference is fundamental. WP Rocket applies patches to existing code. Custom code ensures the code is correct in the first place. Similarly, while services like NitroPack can produce high scores, NitroPack downsides for SEO include potential cloaking issues and a disjointed user experience where the site looks interactive but isn’t.

Plugins are often a short-term patch that creates long-term technical debt. To truly fix performance—specifically fixing LCP without plugins—you must address the foundation. This becomes even more critical when dealing with complex interactivity metrics.


AI Gap: Architectural Refactoring for INP

Artificial Intelligence tools often provide generic advice like “minimize main thread work” or “reduce JavaScript execution time.” However, this advice is useless without showing why the main thread is busy. For most UK businesses using WordPress, the cause is a combination of a heavy theme, page builder code, and multiple plugins all fighting for resources.

Code Comparison: The Difference

To illustrate why fixing core web vitals with custom code works, consider how a button click is handled in a bloated environment versus a clean one.

The Problem (Page Builder Bloat):

// Simplified representation of Page Builder bloat
// Multiple layers of wrappers and generic event listeners
jQuery(document).ready(function($) {
    $('.elementor-element-12345').on('click', function(e) {
        // Heavy library execution
        // Checking for animations
        // Firing tracking pixels
        // Finally executing the action
    });
});

The Solution (Clean Custom Code):

// Lean, direct event handling
const btn = document.getElementById('contact-btn');
btn.addEventListener('click', () => {
    // Direct execution of logic
    toggleModal();
});

The custom approach removes the overhead of libraries like jQuery and the generic wrappers used by page builders. This directly helps fix Interaction to Next Paint WordPress issues by freeing up the browser’s main thread.

Real-World Impact

Jamie Grand’s experience with London commuters on mobile networks highlights that real-world INP is critical. A site must be responsive instantly, not after a delay. According to Google’s documentation, Interaction to Next Paint (INP) assesses a page’s overall responsiveness by observing the latency of all click, tap, and keyboard interactions[4].

By moving to a custom architecture, we can reduce initial server response time UK users experience and eliminate Javascript execution delay risks. It is not about optimizing bad code; it is about replacing it with efficient architecture.


The Security Cost of Bloat

Every plugin added to a website is a new potential entry point for attackers. While speed is important, a security breach can be catastrophic for a small business. Plugin bloat security risks are a major concern when relying on third-party tools for performance.

The Threat is Real for UK Businesses

This isn’t a distant threat; it’s a local reality. The UK Government’s 2024 Cyber Security Breaches Survey revealed that half of all UK businesses (50%) experienced a cyber security breach or attack in the last year[2].

Why Plugins Are Vulnerable

When you rely on plugins, you face a supply chain risk. You are trusting dozens of different developers to maintain secure, up-to-date code. A single abandoned plugin can compromise the entire site. In contrast, secure website hosting UK providers combined with a bespoke build offer a leaner, more controlled environment.

In a bespoke build, the codebase is lean. There are no abandoned plugins or public vulnerabilities to exploit in the same way. Choosing a cheap, plugin-heavy site carries hidden security costs, whereas a professional, custom-coded site is an investment in business continuity.


The "Zero Upfront" Solution for UK Tradespeople

The primary barrier to a high-performance, custom-coded website has always been the high upfront cost, often running into thousands of pounds. This puts it out of reach for many tradespeople and small businesses. We have removed that barrier.

Introducing the "Zero Upfront" Model

Our model offers Zero upfront website cost UK businesses can rely on. Instead of a large initial investment, you pay a manageable monthly fee for a fully managed, bespoke website. This includes hosting, maintenance, and continuous optimization.

Case Study: The Local Advantage

Consider Mark, an electrician in Woodford. His DIY site was slow and unprofessional. An agency quoted him £6,000 for a redesign. Instead, he opted for our plan. As a web designer Woodford speed optimization specialist, we built him a site with a 100/100 PageSpeed score that generates local leads, all for a predictable monthly cost.

Growth-Focused

With the UK Government’s 2024 Small Business Survey showing that 59% of small businesses aim to grow sales, investing in a high-performance digital asset without draining cash flow is more critical than ever[3].

This model aligns our success with yours. We build bespoke web design for tradesmen UK aimed at long-term growth, providing a managed digital presence you don’t have to worry about.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is WP Rocket enough to pass Core Web Vitals?

No, WP Rocket alone is often not enough to pass Core Web Vitals long-term. While it can improve caching and file delivery, it cannot fix underlying issues like bloated themes, excessive plugins, or inefficient code. It acts as a patch, but for a truly fast site, the core architecture must be optimized first.

How to fix LCP without slowing down the site?

To fix LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) without slowing down your site, focus on optimizing the LCP element itself. This involves compressing the image or video, preloading the resource, ensuring it’s not lazy-loaded, and removing any render-blocking CSS or JavaScript that delays its appearance. A custom-coded site builds these optimizations in natively.

Cost of fixing Core Web Vitals UK

The cost of fixing Core Web Vitals in the UK can range from £500 for basic plugin-based fixes to over £5,000 for a full architectural rebuild. A more accessible model is our Zero Upfront managed service, where a bespoke, high-performance site is provided for a flat monthly fee, eliminating high initial costs.

Custom code vs WordPress plugins for speed

Custom code is significantly faster than WordPress with plugins. A bespoke website loads only the essential code needed for its functions, resulting in smaller file sizes and fewer server requests. WordPress sites often carry the weight of a heavy theme and multiple plugins, which slows down performance and creates security risks.

Why is my Interaction to Next Paint (INP) score poor?

A poor INP score is usually caused by excessive JavaScript running on the main browser thread. On WordPress sites, this is often due to complex page builders, animations from themes, and multiple plugins all competing for resources. When a user clicks, the browser is too busy to respond quickly, resulting in a laggy experience.

Can a plugin fix Cumulative Layout Shift?

A plugin generally cannot fix Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) because CLS is an architectural issue. It’s caused by elements like ads, images without defined dimensions, or dynamically injected content shifting the page layout after it loads. These issues must be fixed in the site’s underlying code by specifying sizes and reserving space for content.

Web performance consultant fees London

Web performance consultant fees in London typically range from £75 to £200 per hour, with project-based audits often starting at £1,000. These services focus on identifying issues. For a complete solution, a Web performance consultant UK offering a managed service that includes the build and ongoing optimization offers a more cost-effective, long-term alternative.

Is a bespoke website better for SEO than WordPress?

Yes, a bespoke website is generally better for technical SEO. Its clean, lean code leads to faster load times and perfect Core Web Vitals scores, which are key ranking factors. It also allows for perfect implementation of schema markup and site structure without being limited by a theme’s or plugin’s constraints.

How to remove unused CSS without breaking site?

Removing unused CSS safely requires a careful, methodical approach, often using browser developer tools to identify which styles are not being applied. While plugins attempt to automate this, they can easily break your site’s design. The most effective solution is a custom-coded site that is built from the ground up with only the necessary CSS included.

Best web design for tradespeople UK

The best web design for UK tradespeople prioritizes speed, trust, and mobile-friendliness. It should feature clear contact information, photos of work, customer testimonials, and load instantly on mobile devices. Our web design for UK tradespeople ensures reliability and a professional image without the bloat of common templates.


Limitations, Alternatives & Professional Guidance

While we advocate for custom solutions, it is important to maintain a balanced perspective. For businesses with extremely limited budgets or for non-critical brochure sites, a well-chosen set of plugins on a lightweight WordPress theme can be a viable starting point. However, this approach often requires constant maintenance, carries higher security risks, and may struggle to achieve elite performance scores consistently.

Conversely, custom code offers superior performance but is not a DIY solution. It requires a professional developer to build and maintain the codebase. Our “Zero Upfront” model is specifically designed to solve this challenge by packaging expert development into an accessible monthly plan, removing the technical burden from the business owner.

We advise getting a professional technical audit before making a decision. A Web performance consultant fees in London can be high, but an initial diagnosis is crucial. The right solution depends on your specific business goals, budget, and long-term ambitions.


Conclusion

Chasing Core Web Vitals scores with an endless cycle of plugins is often a losing battle. The root cause of poor performance is almost always architectural bloat. A lean, custom-coded foundation is the only way to help ensure permanent, elite performance. For true success in fixing core web vitals, custom code provides the stable, secure, and fast platform that both users and search engines reward.

Understanding your site’s specific architectural issues is the first step. Jamie Grand offers a free, no-obligation technical audit for UK businesses. We will analyze your current site, identify the root causes of poor performance, and show you a clear path forward—whether you work with us or not.

[Claim your free technical audit]


References

  1. HTTP Archive (2024). Web Almanac: Page Weight.
  2. UK Government (2024). Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2024.
  3. UK Government (2024). Longitudinal Small Business Survey 2024.
  4. Google for Developers. Interaction to Next Paint (INP).